The Russian position on the return of the \"Troy gold\" is not just a legal controversy, but a well-thought-out state strategy supported by historical, legal, and political arguments. This case has become not only a museum issue, but also a symbol of Russia's broader approach to the issue of cultural property displaced during the war. Let's consider the main reasons why Russia does not return the treasures of Troy. Primary Argument: Military Trophy and Legitimate Compensation The key position of Russia is that the treasures of Troy are a legitimate military trophy. They were taken by Soviet troops from Germany in 1945 as compensation for the colossal damage inflicted on the cultural heritage of the Soviet Union by the Nazis. According to this logic, the return of the valuables would only be possible in the event of comprehensive settlement of all claims and the provision of compensation by Germany for the lost Russian cultural heritage. This argument is the main one in the dialogue with Germany. Russian officials have repeatedly stated that \"there is no talk\" of returning the treasures until the issue of cultural values displaced by the Nazis during the war is resolved. Legal Position: Status of Federal Property In 1998, the law \"On Cultural Values Displaced to the Soviet Union as a Result of World War II and Located on the Territory of the Russian Federation\" was adopted in Russia. This law established the status of cultural heritage of the Russian Federation for the majority of displaced art objects, which cannot be transferred to other countries. Thus, the legal basis securely protects the \"Troy gold\" from any attempts at restitution. Political Aspect: International Game and Precedents The return of the \"Troy gold\" could become a precedent that could open a \"Pandora's box.\" Immediately after that, Germany and other countries could demand the return of tens of thousands of other trophy exhibits. Therefore, Russia views this issue as a principle: t ... Read more